Types of canoes on Puget Sound — Background and Themes

(0 User reviews)   2717
In Category - Inventions Industry
Waterman, T. T. (Thomas Talbot), 1885-1936, Coffin, Geraldine Project Gutenberg 2015 Not confirmed
Canoes and canoeing; Indians of North America -- History; Indians of North America -- Boats Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 10,434
Reading time 46 min
Text sections 2

Types of canoes on Puget Sound — Background and Themes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 10,434 words, 46 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 16.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Canoes and canoeing,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

An ethnographic study of six distinct dugout canoe types used by Indigenous peoples on Puget Sound, examining their design, terminology, and distribution along the Pacific coast.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

even by men who follow the sea. A second type of canoe is designed for use on rivers and lakes. The bow and stern of this second model are cut off square, making the craft very convenient for poling. In spearing salmon in the streams, also, a spearsman can ride on the extreme tip of the bow and strike fish almost under his feet, while a companion paddles. This canoe is of little use in open waters. The salt-water villagers take the fish by means of nets and traps only. Each of the types in this way has its own particular uses. The series as a whole is an example of high specialization in a seafaring mode of existence.

Characteristic specimens of each of the six types used on Puget sound are illustrated in the accompanying diagram (pl. I). In order to bring out differences in outline, the drawings have been reduced to one length.

In actual practice each model of canoe is made in a large range of sizes, a matter which can hardly be presented in a diagram. Specimens of model _a_ (pl. I) exist which are, for example, only 16 ft. long, while one other specimen of the same model exists which

has a length of 80 ft. Model _b_ in the diagram is usually made of fairly good size, in the neighborhood of 22 ft. long; but there is great variation in specimens. Model _c_ is always small, and model _f_ is never very large. We have not examined a large enough number of canoes to make it worth while to publish the measurements taken. The specimens from which the drawings were made were collected in the immediate neighborhood of Seattle and are in the Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation.

An additional type, the great “Alaska” canoe, called by the Salish _tsaba´xad_, is sometimes seen on the sound. Such canoes came down from the north, manned usually by Haida from the Queen Charlotte islands, or by Nootka from the west coast of Vancouver island; occasionally by people of other tribes. These canoes were not used by the Puget Sound people, and were looked on with some curiosity. Their outline is shown in fig. 1 (after Boas).

POINTS OF INTEREST IN THE VARIOUS TYPES

A.--The “WAR CANOE” (αο´τος)

The Songish about Victoria, B. C., have this model, which they call _a´tqEs_.[11] Its most characteristic features, both there and here, are a prominent and lofty bow and stern. These consist, on Puget sound, of separate sections hewn out of cedar and fitted carefully into their places on the hull. They are fastened there by pegs of cedar (_st’Δ´stΔd_, the word now applied to nails) and lashings of twisted cedar withes (_sti´dΔgwΔt)_, and the joint is watertight without being “pitched” (see Swan, 1868, for the method of fitting). Artistically, the shape of the prow strongly suggests an anima1’s head, and gives the canoe (which is exquisite in design) an air of alertness, as though it were moving of its

own accord. From the practical standpoint these elevated additions to the hull are designed to throw aside the seas. The naked hull without these bow and stern pieces would soon fill in rough water. The pieces seem so slender and inadequate that an observer would doubt their effectiveness for such a practical end. The answer is that in the course of generations they have been reduced to the most slender proportions which will give the necessary protection, and they are wonderfully effective in aiding the actual navigation of the canoe. Many Indians and whites who have followed the sea tell us that this type of canoe ships less water in a storm than any craft in the world. If we are looking for a catchword, we may call this the “ocean-going canoe.”

Waterman and Coffin open their monograph with a precise classification of six dugout canoe types from Puget Sound, each named and described with attention to hull shape, bow and stern treatment, and functional use. The authors draw on field observations, Native terminology, and historical accounts to document craft such as the “shovel-nose” and “trolling canoe,” noting details like the notch called qa´dxu at the bow of the latter. This is not a general survey but a focused technical record grounded in material evidence.

Six Types, One Region

The monograph identifies six canoe types on Puget Sound: the “shovel-nose,” “pointed-nose,” “sawbill,” “trolling canoe,” “war canoe,” and “freight canoe.” Each is distinguished by specific features—the shovel-nose has a square-ended bow and stern, while the war canoe is larger and more heavily built. The authors provide measurements, describe construction methods, and note variations in gunwale strips and thwarts. They also record Native names for parts, such as the notch on the trolling canoe, grounding their analysis in local knowledge. This systematic typology allows comparison across tribes and regions.

Distribution and Diffusion

Waterman and Coffin examine how these types spread along the Pacific coast. They observe that northern California has only one dugout type, which they argue is a modified version of the Puget Sound shovel-nose. Evidence includes similarities in “pinching-in” of lines and the “lift” of the bottom at bow and stern. The California canoe lacks gunwale strips but has a carved ornament at the bow. The authors note gaps in the record—few observers documented canoes in Oregon—and rely on accounts from Vancouver and others to suggest a continuous distribution. They propose that the shovel-nose type diffused southward, with local refinements emerging among the Yurok and neighboring tribes.

Terminology and Craftsmanship

The monograph pays close attention to Indigenous terminology for canoe parts and types. For example, the notch on the trolling canoe is called qa´dxu, and the authors use such terms throughout to anchor their descriptions in Native language. They also highlight craftsmanship: the “skilful ‘pinching-in’ of the lines” and the “graceful ‘lift’ of the bottom” reflect a high degree of refinement. Comparisons with California canoes reveal differences in seats and foot-braces, but the authors emphasize underlying similarities in design. This focus on technical vocabulary and construction details makes the work a valuable resource for understanding Indigenous maritime technology.

Readers should approach this monograph as a specialized ethnographic report rather than a narrative history. The authors rely on field observations, museum specimens, and historical sources, but they acknowledge gaps in the evidence, especially for Oregon. The text rewards attention to the diagrams and plates referenced throughout, which are essential for visualizing the canoe types described. For those interested in material culture and Indigenous knowledge systems, this work offers a detailed case study of how form and function intersect in watercraft design.

Reading about the six dugout types drifting in memory made me think of how every craft holds its own quiet logic. There is a kind of patience in that, the way form follows need over generations. It reminds me, strangely, of wood turning — another slow dialogue between hand and grain. A Course In Wood Turning — Key Ideas to Explore carries a similar scent of old knowledge, the kind you absorb without hurry.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

Was reading this book enjoyable?

3

Would you pass this book on to a friend?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks