Asbestos, Its production and use With some account of the asbestos mines of Canada — A Reader’s Guide
Edition facts
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Read the Text
Produced by Barbara Kosker and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive)
ASBESTOS ITS PRODUCTION AND USE
_SOME ACCOUNT OF THE ASBESTOS MINES OF CANADA_
LONDON: CROSBY LOCKWOOD AND SON 7, STATIONERS' HALL COURT, LUDGATE HILL 1888
The substance of the following pages was originally comprised in a series of Letters from Canada to a friend in London, who was desirous of obtaining all the authentic information possible on a subject on which so little appears to be generally known.
The use of Asbestos in the arts and manufactures is now rapidly assuming such large proportions that, it is believed, it will presently be found more difficult to say to what purposes it cannot be applied than to what it can and is.
Under these circumstances, although much of the information here given is not new, but has been gathered from every available source, it is hoped that the compilation in its present shape may be found acceptable.
HOTEL VICTORIA, NORTHUMBERLAND AVENUE _April 20, 1888._
ASBESTOS AT THE AMERICAN EXHIBITION 9, 10
ITALIAN AND CANADIAN ASBESTOS COMPARED 16-18
THE ASBESTOS OF ITALY 19-24
CANADIAN MINING FOR ASBESTOS 24-29
ASBESTOS MINES OF CANADA-- THE THETFORD GROUP 29-36 THE COLERAINE GROUP 36-42 BROUGHTON 42-46 DANVILLE 46 SOUTH HAM 47-50 WOLFESTOWN 50
USES TO WHICH ASBESTOS IS APPLIED 55-72
One of Nature's most marvellous productions, asbestos is a physical paradox. It has been called a mineralogical vegetable; it is both fibrous and crystalline, elastic yet brittle; a floating stone, which can be as readily carded, spun, and woven into tissue as cotton or the finest silk.
Called by geologists "asbestus" (the termination in os being the adjective form of the word), the name of the mineral in its Greek form as commonly used (ἄσβεστος), signifies "indestructible." The French adopt the same derivation, calling it "asbeste" (minèral filamenteux et incombustible). In Germany it is called "steinflachs" (stone-flax); and by the Italians "amianto" (from ἀμίαντος, pure, incorruptible); so-called because cloth made from it was cleansed by passing it through fire. Charlemagne, we are told, having a cloth made of this material in his possession, one day after dinner astonished his rude warrior guests by throwing it in the fire, and then withdrawing it cleansed and unconsumed.
As a modern pendent to this well-known legend, the following is current in Quebec. A labouring man, who had left the old country to seek a better fortune in the Dominion, found employment at once on arrival in one of the many lumber yards on the St. Lawrence, where his energy and activity, supplemented by great bodily strength, soon secured for him a good position. It so happened, however, that one evening, on returning from their daily toil to their common apartment, some of his fellow-workmen saw him deliberately throw himself into a seat, kick off his boots, and then pull off his socks, and having opened the door of the stove, coolly fling them in on to the mass of burning wood. Possibly no particular notice would have been taken of this, judged as a mere act of folly and waste on the part of the new-comer; but when, almost immediately afterwards, they saw him open the stove door again, take out the apparently blazing socks, and, after giving them a shake, proceed just as deliberately to draw them on to his feet again, that was a trifle too much! Human nature could not stand that. Consequently the horrified spectators, having for a moment looked on aghast, fled precipitately from the room. To them the facts were clear enough. This, they said, was no human being like themselves; such hellish practices could have but one origin. If not the devil himself, this man certainly could be no other than one of his emissaries. So off they went in a body to the manager and demanded his instant dismissal, loudly asseverating that they would no longer eat, drink, or work in company with such a monster. Enquiry being at once set on foot, it turned out that some time before leaving England the man had worked at an asbestos factory, where he had learned to appreciate the valuable properties of this mineral; and being of an ingenious turn of mind, he had managed to procure some of the fiberized material and therewith knit himself a pair of socks, which he was accustomed to cleanse in the manner described. He was, as has been said, an unusually good workman, consequently his employers had no wish to part with him. Explanation and expostulation, however, were all in vain; nothing could remove the horrible impression that his conduct had made upon the minds of his superstitious fellow-workmen; go he must and did, nor could the tumult be in any way allayed until he had been dismissed from his work and had left the yard.
Leaving this digression, however, it may be said that the peculiar properties of the mineral were known long before Charlemagne's time. The ancients, who believed it to be a plant, made a cere-cloth of it, in which they were accustomed to enwrap the bodies which were to be burned on the funeral pyre, so that the ashes might be retained, separate and intact, for preservation in the family urn, an aperture being left in the cloth to allow a free passage for the flames. How they succeeded in weaving this cloth is now unknown. It has been suggested that its accomplishment was effected by weaving the fibres along with those of flax, and then passing the whole through a furnace to burn out the flax.
The lamps used by the vestal virgins are also said to have been furnished with asbestos wicks, so that the modern adaptation of it to this purpose is only another exemplification of the truth of Solomon's saying that "there is nothing new under the sun."
The mineral has been variously described. In general terms it may be said to be a fibrous variety of serpentine, closely allied to the hornblende family of minerals, the Canadian variety of which is called by mineralogists "chrysotile." In the local vernacular of the mining districts this is "pierre-à-coton" (cotton-stone), perhaps as expressive a term as can be found.
The ore takes a variety of forms; much of it (especially that found in the States) is of a coarse woody character, of but little value for mercantile purposes.
Sir William Logan, in his "Geology of Canada," says that foliated and fibrous varieties of serpentine are common in veins of the ophiolites of the Silurian series, constituting the varieties which have been described under the various names of baltimorite, marmolite, picrolite, and chrysotile. The true asbestos, however, he says, is a fibrous variety of tremolite or hornblende.
In _Le Génie Civil_ for September, 1883, Canadian asbestos is thus described: "La chrysotile du Canada n'est pas comme l'amiante ordinaire formée d'un paquet de fils d'un blanc verdâtre et remplissant des cavités irrégulières: c'est une véritable pierre d'une densité comprise entre 2 et 3, qui se trouve en couches de 3 à 10 centimètres d'épaisseur. Cette pierre possède la propriété de se reduire en fibres perpendiculairement à sa longueur sous un effort très faible. Ses fibres transversales sont plus résistantes et beaucoup plus facile à filer, à tisser, et à feutrer que l'amiante ordinaire." This is as good a description of chrysotile as can be found anywhere.
Until the discovery of the Canadian mines, the variety here spoken of as amiante (amianthus), was esteemed the most rare and delicate kind, on account of its beautifully white, flexible, long, and delicately laid fibres. This variety is generally found buried in the centre of the older crystalline rocks in the Pyrenees, the Alps of Dauphiny, on Mount St. Gothard, in North America, in the serpentines of Sweden, the Ural Mountains, Silesia, and New South Wales. The most beautiful specimens, such as are preserved in museums and mineralogical collections, have mostly been brought from Tarantaise in Savoy, or from Corsica.[1] In this latter place it is said to be so abundant that, its mercantile value being unknown, it has often been used, instead of tow, as a material for packing.
In a handbook published by the Dominion Government in 1882 (before the discovery of the mines of chrysotile) on the mineral resources of Canada, it is said that--
"What is commercially known as asbestos is really a term used to denote a peculiar fibrous form assumed by several distinct minerals, rather than to designate any particular species. Tremolite, actinolite, and other forms of hornblende and serpentine, passing into fibrous varieties, assume the name of asbestos, and the 'Geology of Canada' does not give the mineral as a distinct one, but recognizes it under these different headings. As yet comparatively little asbestos has been found in Canada."
This is sufficient to show how small was the interest, even so recently as that, attaching to this substance in the very country which was so soon to find it taking important rank amongst her natural productions.
That singularly beautiful mineral termed "crocidolite," which displays such sheens and radiances of gold and bronze and green as give it the appearance of satin changed into stone, is nothing more than compressed asbestos. The derivation of its name is not happy. It is said to be from κροκος λιθος, simply crocus-coloured or yellow stone. This is doubtless its general colour, but the finest crocidolite is anything but yellow.
Having heard that there were some fine specimens of asbestos on view at the recent exhibition of the United States products at Earl's Court, I made a journey there specially to see them. In this, however, I was disappointed. There was but one small tray of so-called asbestos (amphibole) on view; and this was of a coarse woody character, very similar in appearance to a sample I had had sent to me recently from California. It was, moreover, of a very poor colour and certainly not of the kind that would readily find a market. I found there, however, a piece of unmistakable chrysotile, grouped amongst a miscellaneous lot of American minerals. The exhibitor at once told me, in reply to my questions, that this was not an American product at all, but that it was a "vegetable matter" found in Canada. He evidently did not know much about it, and said it was not asbestos at all. It was not by any means a fine specimen: it had somewhat the appearance of ordinary Thetford No. 1, though differing slightly in colour. I could get no further information about it, except that it had come from near Ottawa.
At this exhibition I found a splendid display of crocidolite, the sight of which well repaid the visit. I secured a good specimen, but found, on enquiry, that like all the superior qualities of this mineral, it had been brought from Griqualand (South Africa). The sample I secured was of the kind that in the States is called "Tiger-eye," as I presume, from its general tawny-coloured streaky brilliancy. The exhibitor said it was a silicate of iron occurring in asbestos-like fibres. It is of an exceedingly hard, densely compact nature; from its hardness difficult to work, but susceptible of a very high polish. A few years ago it was thought to be a precious stone and accordingly commanded a high price, but recent discoveries of large deposits considerably reduced its value. It is used for a variety of ornamental purposes, for which, from its extreme natural beauty, it is peculiarly adapted. The grain is very fine and in its rough state the fibres are singularly distinct.
There is another very singular substance worth alluding to here, which is often put forward as a substitute for asbestos, and which is said by the manufacturers to be fireproof, frost-proof, vermin-proof, sound-proof, indestructible, and odourless. This is a good deal to say, but is in a great measure true. It is largely used in the United Slates, especially for insulating and other purposes of a like kind. I mean the artificially manufactured material called "Mineral or Slag Wool," which is made from the refuse of the furnaces at ironworks, by, it is said, passing jets of steam through molten slag. This material is manufactured on a somewhat extensive scale by the Western Mineral Wool Company, of Cleveland, Ohio. There is no doubt it is a very useful substance for many of the purposes for which it is recommended, but it can scarcely be expected to compete to any material extent with asbestos from its total want of elasticity and lubricity. Even the finest quality on being crushed between the fingers has a harsh, gritty, metallic feeling, very different from the silky, springy, and greasy feel of the natural fibre.
In connection with this manufactured article, a very curious natural production is called to mind, the origin of which is somewhat similar though brought about by natural causes. I refer to the product of the lava-beds of Hawaii, called by the natives "Pélé's hair." Miss C. F. Gordon Cumming, in her "Fire Fountains of Hawaii," speaks of this as "filaments of stringy brown lava, like spun glass, which lie scattered here and there, having been caught by the wind (when thrown up) in mid-air in a state of perfect fusion, forming fine lava drops, a rain of liquid rock, and so drawn out in silky threads like fine silky hair."
"In fact, this filmy, finely spun glass is known as Pélé's hair--Rauoho o Pélé. It is of a rich olive green or yellowish brown colour--a hint for æsthetic fashions--and is glossy, like the byssus of certain shells, but very brittle to handle. Sometimes when the great fire-fountains toss their spray so high that it flies above the level of the cliffs, the breeze catches it sportively and carries it far away over the island; and the birds line their nests with this silky volcanic hair. Sometimes you can collect handfuls clinging to the rocks to which it has drifted, generally with a pear-shaped drop attached to it." This, it is evident, would crumble and break off short in the fingers, and the mineral wool when handled has just the same gritty brittle feeling one can imagine Pélé's hair to have.
Returning to asbestos, however, its formation or actual origin is at present unknown. In its pure state it is as heavy as the rock in which it is found, so closely are its fine elastic crystalline fibres compressed together. These have a beautiful silky lustre, varying in colour from pure white to a dusky grey or green, sometimes of a yellowish green; the direction of the fibres being transverse to the walls of the vein. The essential point in which it differs from any other known mineral consists in its being at once fibrous and textile. Its quality is determined by the greater or less proportion of silicious or gritty matter with which its fibres are associated. When crushed out from the rock, these fibres, which vie in delicacy with the finest flax or the most beautiful silk, can be corded, spun, and woven into cloth in precisely the same way as any other textile fibre.
Of good quality it is only found in serpentine. One instance of its having been found in quartz is mentioned; but, even in that case we are told, when six feet of the superficial quartz rock had been blasted away, the inevitable serpentine was found cropping through.
According to Mr. Ells,[2] the serpentines in which it is found are intimately associated with masses of dioritic or doloritic rocks, of which rocks certain varieties, rich in olivine or some allied mineral, the serpentine is, in many cases, an alteration product. They are frequently associated with masses and dykes of whitish rocks, which are often composed entirely of quartz and felspar, but occasionally with a mixture of black mica, forming a granitoid rock. They occur generally not far from the axes of certain anticlinals which exist in the group of rocks called by Sir William Logan the "altered Quebec group."
For centuries asbestos was regarded merely as a mineral curiosity. Indeed, it is only within the last few years that it has developed into a valuable article of commerce, the first modern experiments in the use of it practically extending no farther back than 1850.
Its uses in the arts and manufactures are of a very important character, and now that it is clearly demonstrated that a fairly abundant supply can be obtained at a moderate cost, there seems no reasonable limit to be put to the demand, new uses for it being continually found. These will, of course, rapidly increase as its value becomes more clearly and widely known.
It is found in most parts of the world, but in only a few places of a sufficiently valuable kind or in quantities large enough to give it any commercial value. The main sources of supply at present are Canada and Italy.
A good deal has, at times, been found in Russia; and I remember an incident which occurred a few years ago at some extensive ironworks in that country, with which I was at the time connected, which amusingly illustrates how little was then known there of the nature and properties of the mineral. The iron ore, in the district referred to, is found in bunches or nodules, near the surface of the ground; and in order to get it, the peasants dig out pits about seven or eight feet in depth, and then burrow, rabbit-like, into the surrounding earth in all directions below. When all the ore is got out from one spot, they dig another pit further afield, and so they go on until the particular patch of ground they are working on is exhausted. On the occasion referred to, some of our men, in their burrowing, threw out a considerable quantity of asbestos. They had not the slightest idea what it was. In fact, they knew nothing at all about it, except that it was not what they were in search of; and, consequently, as it obstructed their work, they threw it all out in a heap near the piles of ore. Presently, one of the foremen or overlookers saw it, and wanted to know what all that rubbish had been put there for. "Here," said he, to some of the men, "just clear up all that mess at once, and fling it into the furnace, and get rid of it." And this was immediately done, with what result you may imagine.
Recently, however, it is said that enormous quantities of asbestos have been found in Russia, although I cannot learn that any use is made of it there at present. Its mercantile value must of course depend on its quality and distance from market. I have had a great number of specimens sent me, but they mostly turn out to be a coarse kind of so-called bastard asbestos, which would not pay for extracting. Now, however, we are told that from Orenburg to Ekaterinburg the country is thickly dotted with asbestos deposits, while near the Verkin Tagil ironworks there is a hill called Sholkovaya Gora, or Hill of Silk, which it is asserted is entirely composed of asbestos. The ore here is also said to be of the best white quality, well adapted for all the most important purposes to which asbestos is applied. I should much like to see a specimen of this; its value could be easily determined on inspection. In the Gorobtagsdat district of Perm, again, there are said to be large deposits cropping out above the surface, and also that enormous quantities could be had there for nothing, as at this moment it possesses no value in the Ural region. I imagine it would be found of considerable value if a practical man were sent out to see to its fiberization on the spot, when it might be compressed, packed, and exported in the same way as cotton. There can, however, be little doubt that if its quality is as good as it is represented to be, it will very soon be utilized, and will then form a very important addition to the vast mineral wealth of that region.
Robert H. Jones opens his 1888 work by calling asbestos “one of Nature's most marvellous productions” and a “physical paradox,” a phrase that sets the tone for a book blending technical description with a sense of wonder. The preface reveals that the text originated as a series of letters from Canada to a London friend seeking reliable information on a subject then little understood. Jones acknowledges that much of his material is compiled from various sources, but the firsthand accounts of Canadian mines give the book its distinct character.
The opening chapter immediately contrasts the mineral's contradictory qualities—fibrous yet crystalline, elastic yet brittle—and traces its name through Greek, French, German, and Italian terms, each emphasizing indestructibility or purity. Anecdotes, such as Charlemagne's fire-cleaned cloth and a Quebec story about a labourer, ground the technical discussion in human interest.
From Letters to a London Friend
The book's structure is shaped by its origin as correspondence. Jones explains in the preface that the substance of the work “was originally comprised in a series of Letters from Canada to a friend in London, who was desirous of obtaining all the authentic information possible.” This epistolary foundation explains the direct, observational tone and the frequent use of first-person accounts. The reader encounters the mines through Jones's own visits, as when he describes walking the ground at Broughton “in company with the late Mr. Fraser” in autumn 1886. These personal details lend credibility and immediacy, but they also mean the coverage is uneven: some mines are described in detail, while others, like the one at Danville, are noted only from secondhand reports. Jones candidly admits when he lacks firsthand knowledge, writing of Danville, “I much regret that time did not permit of a visit to this mine, so I can give no details of my own personal knowledge.”
The Paradox of a Mineral That Burns Clean
Jones repeatedly emphasizes asbestos's contradictory nature, calling it “a mineralogical vegetable” and “a floating stone.” He notes that it can be “carded, spun, and woven into tissue as cotton or the finest silk,” yet it is a rock. The historical anecdote of Charlemagne throwing an asbestos cloth into fire to clean it serves as a recurring touchstone, and Jones adds a modern Quebec parallel about a labourer whose boots were thrown into a stove. These stories illustrate the mineral's fire-resistant property without relying on technical jargon. The book also catalogues the various names for asbestos across languages—steinflachs (stone-flax) in German, amianto in Italian—each highlighting a different aspect of its utility. This linguistic survey reinforces the idea that asbestos has long fascinated different cultures, though Jones does not explore the historical record beyond these brief mentions.
Distinctive Ore and Local Geology
A striking feature of the book is Jones's attention to the visual and physical differences among asbestos ores from different Canadian localities. At Broughton, he observes that the ore has “a pale yellowish hue, as distinguished from the greenish metallic lustre which distinguishes the finer samples from Thetford.” He adds that this colour difference “at once identifies the locality of its production” and that an expert can tell the source by inspection. Such specificity suggests that Jones was writing for an audience of potential investors or manufacturers who needed to evaluate ore quality. He also notes the presence of associated minerals, such as soapstone (steatite) at Broughton, and describes a curious specimen that had “all the grain and even the fibrous markings of asbestos” but was pure steatite. These geological observations ground the book in practical field experience.
Mining Methods and Vein Behaviour
The excerpts from the mining sections reveal a practical, on-the-ground perspective. At Broughton, Jones describes an open cut “15 to 20 feet deep by 8 feet wide following the vein” and notes that the serpentine reef is exposed for about 900 feet. He recounts how water in the cut prevented him from tracing the big veins, and he infers that “a sudden dip downwards” would require considerable expense to reach the seam again. The strike and dip are given precisely: “east and west, and the dip 30°.” At Danville, he reports that faults are numerous and that some good veins two inches thick are “cut off completely at a distance of fifty feet from the surface.” These details, drawn from personal inspection or reliable reports, give the reader a concrete sense of the challenges and uncertainties of asbestos mining in the 1880s.
Jones's book is best read as a contemporary document of industrial exploration, not a comprehensive treatise. The reader should note that the author's firsthand knowledge is limited to the mines he visited, and that his enthusiasm for asbestos's potential is balanced by candid admissions of ignorance. The work's value lies in its specific observations of ore colour, vein structure, and mining difficulties, which are reported without the hindsight of later health concerns. Approached as a period piece, it offers a vivid snapshot of how a promising mineral was understood and exploited in the late nineteenth century.
Luke Campbell
2 weeks ago-
Rachel Barnes - 3 weeks ago
{'type': 'neutral', 'text': "This book offers a comprehensive look at the asbestos industry and its early 20th-century significance, especially in Canada. The historical and geological details are well-researched, but the content is understandably dated and lacks today's health and safety perspectives. It's a valuable reference for historians, but readers looking for modern applications will be disappointed."} -
April Williams - 1 week ago
{'type': 'positive', 'text': "A remarkably thorough and engaging account of asbestos, tracing its history, geology, and industrial applications. The author writes with clarity and offers an in-depth look at the mining operations in Canada, including the challenges and techniques. It's an eye-opening read for anyone interested in industrial history or the materials that shaped modern civilization. Detailed illustrations enhance the narrative, making it a pleasure to read."} -
Lee Day - 4 days ago
{'type': 'negative', 'text': "While historically interesting, this book presents asbestos without any mention of its severe health risks, which were known even then. It reads more like promotional material for the industry than an objective study. The writing is dry and overly technical, making it a struggle to finish. Given what we now know, it's irresponsible to recommend this without a strong cautionary note, and there are far better contemporary resources on the subject."}
What was your reading experience?
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.
Sophia Robinson
2 weeks ago